Quo Vadis QAR?

Quo Vadis QAR?

Michelle Levy’s Quality of Advice Review (QAR), seems keen to put the banks back in business flogging their products to trusting customers, with the only protection that the advice be “good”, rather than in the customer’s “best interests”.

Will bank employees who thought their job was to help customers with their banking needs be given sales targets and unhappy consequences for not meeting them? Can advice still be “good” If the process is designed primarily to benefit shareholders and senior management?

The courts will be called upon to decide what “good” advice is, which could see banks handing back another ton of cash. Consumer advocacy group CHOICE believe the QAR recommendations are a “recipe for another Royal Commission”. This humble commentator is thinking of dusting off his legal qualification and joining the fray.

Financial advisers will still have to meet the “best interests” duty which would be a true fiduciary duty reflecting the general law. Their advice can’t just be “good”. AIOFP executive director Peter Johnston thinks Ms Levy is giving the banks and institutions a ‘free kick’ back into mainstream advice without adequate protection for consumers in place”.

In the background there is a new “kid on the block”, ChatGPT.
Today I asked it the question;

I have $300,000 dollars in my account and want to withdraw $65, 000 dollars a year in ten years’ time. How much do I need to contribute.

In a few seconds ChatGPT made some very reasonable assumptions and gave me the answer including details on how it was calculated. I wondered how it would perform on products and asked it to analyse BHP shares which it did, discussing Performance, Prospects, ESG progress, Valuation and an overall commentary. All free and within a minute. Clients in the future will be able to easily assess any product being pushed on them.

Can recommending a product that is relatively expensive with a history of underperformance be “good” advice, especially if the sale is motivated by an employee looking for a bonus or to just keep their job?

Its hard to believe the current government will accept these proposals but time will tell.

Similar Posts

  • Jake of the Nullarbor

    Jake used to be a top solicitor in Sydney, with a corner office, and panoramic view of Sydney harbour. His specialty was contract law. He paid little attention to the small team looking into artificial intelligence until they asked him to hand over all the files on all his clients. They explained this was so…

  • Modern slavery

    Is it better to own your work force rather than to rent it? “Slavery” is coming back. Most of us already have a slave or two like a vacuum cleaning robot, or an Alexa app that turns on your appliances and gives you information on demand. AI (Artificial intelligence) is going to give us an…

  • Cloud computing

      New technologies for financial planning – Cloud computing What is cloud computing? “The Cloud” is a collection  of servers, networks, storage facilities, development tools, and applications (apps) delivered through the internet. Businesses can access these “cloud” services saving them the cost of servers, engineers, programmers and related staff. The Cloud can store and make…

  • AI Agents

    For those who are still wondering, an AI agent is a computer program that can observe, decide, and act on its own to achieve a goal. Unlike traditional AI that respond to a single prompt, agents operate in a loop: they observe → reason → act → observe the results → adjust. They break complex…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *