Modern slavery

Is it better to own your work force rather than to rent it? “Slavery” is coming back.

Most of us already have a slave or two like a vacuum cleaning robot, or an Alexa app that turns on your appliances and gives you information on demand. AI (Artificial intelligence) is going to give us an army of slaves providing efficiency, productivity, and information.

Financial advisers for example are looking to AI for efficiency and a better client experience. AMP’s new Digital Financial Advice Market Scan reported a surge of interest in digital solutions. These solutions have arrived.

Finchat’s financial planning assistant is trained to test scenarios, examine products, and produce an advice document using voice and touch only. This dramatically reduces the time (and cost) to prepare advice and is arguably a better experience for the client.

Finchat.io (unrelated to Australian finchat above) has detailed information and analysis of over 800 companies (and growing) a user can investigate. This makes it easier for a stockbroker to access compelling information to support a recommendation. Gembot.ai goes further and offers share trading as well.

Some will trust the AI “slave”, others will only deal with a human. Most will prefer a hybrid process that takes the best of both.

How will modern slavery affect society?

Most commentators see AI taking jobs and creating a “useless” class of worker who are unable to upskill and compete in the shrinking AI dominated job market. According to Elon Musk, the pace of technological change is leading to “a massive social challenge. I think ultimately, we will have to have some kind of universal basic income. I don’t think we’re going to have a choice.”

Just like Roman times, if a slave can do the job there was no sense hiring anyone.

Similar Posts

  • 2021: an advice odyssey

    Financial planners have used algorithms for ages. Financial planning software churns out advice documents, re-balancing algorithms keep asset mixes aligned to risk profiles and research software forms the basis of product recommendations. Why can’t we let clients access the software directly and reduce costs? Planning software is difficult to use and understand. Even financial planners…

  • Don’t be a wimp!

    Windows, mouse, and keyboard are going the way of the dodo. It’s much easier to talk in your normal voice. In the context of financial planning advice: Windows OS: Will slowly become invisible. It will live mostly in the cloud, streaming apps with minimal local hardware. This has begun with the ChromeOS model, Windows 365 Cloud…

  • The real future of affordable and accessible advice

    QAR (Quality of Advice Review) is about making financial planning advice affordable and accessible to ordinary Australians. Qualified, licensed advisers have seen their numbers fall to nearly half as education and compliance requirements suffocate them and force up the cost of giving advice. According to Adviser Ratings, only 10.1% of consumers saw a wealth adviser…

  • Quo Vadis QAR?

    Quo Vadis QAR? Michelle Levy’s Quality of Advice Review (QAR), seems keen to put the banks back in business flogging their products to trusting customers, with the only protection that the advice be “good”, rather than in the customer’s “best interests”. Will bank employees who thought their job was to help customers with their banking…

  • Robo wars

    Apple, Amazon, Microsoft and Google have a combined market capitalisation bigger than the GDP of most countries. If they believe “voice” is the future then it probably is. Most of us use their digital assistants. We ask Apple’s Siri to call mum, Amazon’s Alexa to turn on the lights, Microsoft’s Cortana for the day’s schedule…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *